red robot master
Private
Reputation: +0/-0
 Offline
Posts: 14
|
 |
« on: April 15, 2006, 01:46:52 PM » |
|
he double-accounts, he even said so himself!
Webster(#8154)
2006-04-16 17:41:10
Re: Re: Re: COUNTER ATTACK!!!
we are the same people not a very nice person
Replied to message:
shut up, f**k**g noob! you wouldn't even have wun the first time if that f**k**g necro didn't attack me!!!!!!!i knwo you 2 work together, but so can i!!!!!!!
right from spaceo. I was mad ,thats hwy i called him a noob, but i actually was right too: he only attacks using his webster account after he attacked someone on his necro account.
|
|
|
|
|
FTP
First Sergeant
Reputation: +122/-53
Offline
Posts: 1872
|
|
« Reply #1 on: April 15, 2006, 02:01:53 PM » |
|
Multiple acounts is allowed in SO
|
|
|
|
Ricu
Sergeant
Reputation: +1/-1
Offline
Posts: 258
|
|
« Reply #2 on: April 15, 2006, 04:04:42 PM » |
|
Multiple accounts are allowed , but helping one account with another is not  |
|
|
|
Charlemagne
Staff Sergeant
Reputation: +3/-4
Offline
Posts: 456
|
|
« Reply #3 on: April 15, 2006, 07:28:19 PM » |
|
Regardless this thread is irrelevant. Requesting this thead be locked and filed in the recycle bin.
|
In this picture there are 40 people. None of them can be seen. In this film we hope to show you how not to be seen.
|
|
|
ars68
Master Sergeant
Reputation: +11/-4
Offline
Posts: 849
Viva la C&C
|
|
« Reply #4 on: April 15, 2006, 11:20:54 PM » |
|
yes, before you go accusing anyone, look up the actual Space Odyssey Terms Of Conditions. you will see multiple accounts IS allowed, and almost (and I mean most likely ALMOST) every single person in top 50 or so either IS or HAS a multi.
I agree, this should be locked, but I think it should stay here, to serve as an example of what NOT to do when upset because you got owned just starting a game.
by the way, anyone here know of a really good game the you CAN'T get owned while you are a noob??
|
control the present, seize the future. seize the future, conquer the past. conquer the past, control the present. that and cookies. lots and lots of cookies   |
|
|
red robot master
Private
Reputation: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 14
|
|
« Reply #5 on: April 17, 2006, 07:40:20 AM » |
|
yes, i do!
|
|
|
|
|
Seither
Lord of the Post Count
Reputation: +75/-63
Offline
Posts: 3786
A True Hero is made of: Power, Wisdom, and Courage
|
|
« Reply #6 on: April 17, 2006, 10:34:27 AM » |
|
No, this guy he's reporting IS breaking the rules. He's using his necro account to weaken him and then attack him on his webster account to gain power/segments/credits. THAT is against ToS. You'll need some battle reports and/or your logs from the view logs area that show both attacks. Post them here or send them to Sir Emi.
|
|
|
|
ars68
Master Sergeant
Reputation: +11/-4
Offline
Posts: 849
Viva la C&C
|
|
« Reply #7 on: April 17, 2006, 07:38:08 PM » |
|
hmmm... just a quick question Seither, I have seen this kind of activity going on before to me even, and I want to know how there is really much of a difference between that and the same person attacking? when he goes to counter, he will be able to take back segments and other things from 2 accounts. and he could have simply done 2 attacks anyway, there isn't much difference really.
btw, what I saw:
A hits B
B has C neb and zero A
B then counters through neb doing additional damage.
the only main difference is this means he didn't need an alliance member to do it. anyway, I could be wrong though, just I am pretty sure what Sir Emi mainly meant is account farming, using several account's segments and pooling them together into 1 account. however... this can actually even look like attacking, but really transferring.
|
control the present, seize the future. seize the future, conquer the past. conquer the past, control the present. that and cookies. lots and lots of cookies |
|
|
Seither
Lord of the Post Count
Reputation: +75/-63
Offline
Posts: 3786
A True Hero is made of: Power, Wisdom, and Courage
|
|
« Reply #8 on: April 19, 2006, 06:37:03 AM » |
|
It's one of those questionable things that Sir Emi should clrify somewhere, but never has, because I know we had this discussion on the old forum many times.
|
|
|
|
|
