Cameron07
Master Sergeant
Reputation: +154/-76
 Offline
Posts: 1376
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: May 30, 2007, 10:22:56 PM » |
|
meh.. its spaceo wars.. i say you take away alliances and truces.. that would make it interesting..
|
|
|
|
Lammalord
First Sergeant
Reputation: +64/-182
Offline
Posts: 1958
Lamma.
|
|
« Reply #16 on: May 31, 2007, 12:38:41 AM » |
|
ha ha ha! well i think there needs to be allainces.. but smaller 20 is too big for a start at least.. make it terrirtoaly more stars controled the bigger you get  |
|
|
|
Bugboy
Private
Reputation: +3/-0
Offline
Posts: 22
|
|
« Reply #17 on: May 31, 2007, 03:43:09 AM » |
|
There is a fault in your suggestion Lamma, in SO wars the whole basis of the game is galaxy, with your suggestion, one alliance could potentially have more than 100 people guarding 1 base making it impossible to to attack the base
|
I am all powerful I am a destroyer of worlds beware you shall face my wrath
|
|
|
Lammalord
First Sergeant
Reputation: +64/-182
Offline
Posts: 1958
Lamma.
|
|
« Reply #18 on: June 02, 2007, 01:53:01 AM » |
|
while their other 95 bases are easly being destoyed with everyone killed loseing an alaince member..
also other bases may suffer from random events that cuase a hault in production, or lose the space base all toghether.. forceing the 100 people to be spread out.. what im saying you CAN have a 100 member allaince but it will be really hard to mantain all the bases
|
|
|
|
Satan
Sergeant
Reputation: +12/-14
Offline
Posts: 225
|
|
« Reply #19 on: June 02, 2007, 06:45:08 PM » |
|
I think its a pretty good idea... and with everyone at diffretn tech levels their could be main bases with exceptional power and weaker ones that probbly wont last that long
|
As long as two people live on this earth, there will be war.
|
|
|
Lammalord
First Sergeant
Reputation: +64/-182
Offline
Posts: 1958
Lamma.
|
|
« Reply #20 on: June 02, 2007, 07:04:18 PM » |
|
excally.. i mean if 1 allaince had 1000 member and every start how long would it last against 10-15k other people constantly hitting its space bases, even if there weaker it would be near impossible to hold.. problems with a larger alliance will make it possible but VERY hard to mantain.. and for 20.. you can say after haveing 5 normal members and 15 stars (20 members total) then the diffculty of holding a star increases by every space base you set up
|
|
|
|
Gunfighter Frank
Master Sergeant
Reputation: +36/-6
Offline
Posts: 806
|
|
« Reply #21 on: June 03, 2007, 03:58:14 PM » |
|
I like the idea as a general but we need to flesh it out and refine it.
|
Gunfighter Frank
Semper-FI
DO or DIE
|
|
|
Lammalord
First Sergeant
Reputation: +64/-182
Offline
Posts: 1958
Lamma.
|
|
« Reply #22 on: June 05, 2007, 12:15:56 AM » |
|
of course i know that lol.. but it seems a great basic idea
|
|
|
|
thezerg
Staff Sergeant
Reputation: +29/-5
Offline
Posts: 389
|
|
« Reply #23 on: June 05, 2007, 01:02:54 AM » |
|
I like it on paper but it has a long way to go to get it right. Otherwise bad things could happen
|
|
|
|
Gallente Federation
Private
Reputation: +1/-0
Offline
Posts: 7
|
|
« Reply #24 on: July 30, 2007, 10:04:25 PM » |
|
|
*---> Gallente Federation <---*
Our federation is military force
versus crime, pirating and killing.
We protect our member !!!
|
|
|
|
deezee66
Guest
|
|
« Reply #25 on: July 31, 2007, 02:59:55 AM » |
|
Well i heard a rumor a while back about changing to differant levels of alliances where you have more than one leader sort of like having governors maybe something like that could work.  |
|
|
|
|
thezerg
Staff Sergeant
Reputation: +29/-5
Offline
Posts: 389
|
|
« Reply #26 on: July 31, 2007, 12:43:23 PM » |
|
That could be interesting. But it wouldnt be an alliance anymore. It would be more like the fudal system-esque that ive seen on another game i used to play
|
|
|
|
|
