i don't, all I said was that was what he had said before. I even made it clear this is not what he was saying now. And the same can go for you. And that nicholas thing is a joke charlemagne started when nicholas said he was leaving, since we squabbled a lot. I'm not affraid of you or anyone else, I may be 17 (Turned on April 5th) but I'm smart as well, and all I' doing is stating what is KNOWN to HAVE BEENB said PREVIOUSLY. Wither this is still true or not, I don't know. I never claimed anything of that sort, nor that i have any sway over the gameplay, but as I am making a 1 player game myself, and I play a lot of video games, I can see a good reason to why sir emi would do something like this. I'm not saying it is why he did it, I'm saying it MIGHT be why. I am in no way, shape, or form saying this is Sir Emi's words or opinion, or that it is even a fact. I'm saying it MIGHT be the reason why, from a logical stand point, it makes sense. whatever the real reason is unknown to me, but this is what I think it is, and I clearly stated that in my previous post:
I'm only repeating what he said before. And he's sells turns incase you want to buy turns rather then credits. But I'm not saying this is what he would say or means, I'm saying this is what he did say before.
Notice i clearly stated that it was what he had said previously, at an earlier time. Then I went on to say it may not be what he would say now, or even what this whole ordeal is about. so this attack on me, mainly you saying I'm putting words in Sir Emi's mouth, is unjustified. I stated my opinion, as you did, all I did differently was make counter points to your points. And if my opinion on what is the reason behind it, then nor does yours. You claim it is unfair, I claim it IS fair, but my opinion doesn't count yet yours does, even though neither of us designed the game? Doesn't work that way. And i may be younger then you, but you forget, people my age are three times more informed then you were at this age, so I know what I'm talking about. And the way Zyggy stated his opinion is good, and I respect that it is his opinion, even if i don't agree with it, just like I respect you have your opinion. I don't want to argue with you, but you are attacking me and my opinion, and I'm not going to sit and let you attack me. Had you respoded differently, more along the lines of, I don;t think that's why, something stating you understood it was my opinion and you didn't agree, I wouldn't have responded again, but you didn't. I've got the majority of SO against me on this discussion because they think it is bad, so I can't just post my opinion and sway anyone elses opinion, I've got to make counter points. No matter who had posted above me, I would have made counter points to their points in an attempt to get people to see why this might be a good thing, or at least why Sir emi might have done it. All mights there. Everything I've stated is speculation combined with logic, that's it. It is not fact, but an opinion drawn by using logic to see what Sir Emi's side of the story might be.
So before you tell me to shut up, my opinion doesn't matter because I'm young, inexpeirenced, whatever your reason may be, think about following your own advice and respect other's opinions, like I respect yours and Zyggy's. You're what, 40? I look at your opinion with amusement, becuase you apparently think since you've lived for so long, your opinion is more respectable. News flash, an opinion of a 7 year old is as valueable as your's or mine, because it is an opinion, one person's view on something. Now, were we both to know the same facts about why it was done, and this arguement ensued, then yes, your senoirity would make you more believable, but when it's an opinion, we're equals.
I respect you think this is a horrible thing and all that, so you should respect that I think it is good and that the reasons I posted for it happening are what I believe were the reason it was done. They are in no way facts, and I never said they were, you did.
