Lammalord
First Sergeant
Reputation: +64/-182
 Offline
Posts: 1958
Lamma.
|
 |
« on: September 25, 2006, 08:13:37 PM » |
|
Invader Lammalord (#4495)
Engaged Units
Fleet Name # of Units Attack Defence Hitpoints
Mage "o" Matic 1 12170171379621844 0 11747998898997276
Nameless 1 1 9127628165336052 0 8810998898997208
Flying rabbit go BOOM! 1 1 8066638433683409 0 6461398898997228
hole in the side! 1 1 5866645647969144 0 4699198898997245
Pacifiing Monkay 1 1 3666652862254883 0 2936998898997263
Defender Unidentified Fleet (#)
Engaged Units
Fleet Name # of Units Attack Defence Hitpoints
CL Gamber Bay 368969 191847574285 3286282071 484000000000
Assault Note
Lammalord(#4495)'s Mage "o" Matic fleet engaged Unidentified Fleet(#)'s CL Gamber Bay fleet on the battlefield.
The fleet Mage "o" Matic did 1932114373325690 damage to fleet CL Gamber Bay.
Lammalord(#4495)'s Mage "o" Matic fleet destroyed 3991 of Unidentified Fleet(#)'s CL Gamber Bay fleet.
The fleet CL Gamber Bay did 11747998898997276 damage to fleet Mage "o" Matic.
Unidentified Fleet(#)'s CL Gamber Bay fleet destroyed 1 of Lammalord(#4495)'s Mage "o" Matic fleet.
Lammalord(#4495)'s Nameless 1 fleet engaged Unidentified Fleet(#)'s CL Gamber Bay fleet on the battlefield.
The fleet Nameless 1 did 1145951632186384 damage to fleet CL Gamber Bay.
Lammalord(#4495)'s Nameless 1 fleet destroyed 2368 of Unidentified Fleet(#)'s CL Gamber Bay fleet.
The fleet CL Gamber Bay did 1942362561541778 damage to fleet Nameless 1.
Unidentified Fleet(#)'s CL Gamber Bay attack failed.
Lammalord(#4495)'s Flying rabbit go BOOM! 1 fleet engaged Unidentified Fleet(#)'s CL Gamber Bay fleet on the battlefield.
The fleet Flying rabbit go BOOM! 1 did 871802495424657 damage to fleet CL Gamber Bay.
Lammalord(#4495)'s Flying rabbit go BOOM! 1 fleet destroyed 1801 of Unidentified Fleet(#)'s CL Gamber Bay fleet.
The fleet CL Gamber Bay did 1942362561541778 damage to fleet Flying rabbit go BOOM! 1.
Unidentified Fleet(#)'s CL Gamber Bay attack failed.
Lammalord(#4495)'s hole in the side! 1 fleet engaged Unidentified Fleet(#)'s CL Gamber Bay fleet on the battlefield.
The fleet hole in the side! 1 did 303346359523949 damage to fleet CL Gamber Bay.
Lammalord(#4495)'s hole in the side! 1 fleet destroyed 627 of Unidentified Fleet(#)'s CL Gamber Bay fleet.
The fleet CL Gamber Bay did 1248661646705428 damage to fleet hole in the side! 1.
Unidentified Fleet(#)'s CL Gamber Bay attack failed.
Lammalord(#4495)'s Pacifiing Monkay 1 fleet engaged Unidentified Fleet(#)'s CL Gamber Bay fleet on the battlefield.
The fleet Pacifiing Monkay 1 did 0 damage to fleet CL Gamber Bay.
Lammalord(#4495)'s Pacifiing Monkay 1 attack failed.
The fleet CL Gamber Bay did 2936998898997263 damage to fleet Pacifiing Monkay 1.
Unidentified Fleet(#)'s CL Gamber Bay fleet destroyed 1 of Lammalord(#4495)'s Pacifiing Monkay 1 fleet.
Assault result
Lammalord(#4495)'s 1 Mage "o" Matic are destroyed during battle.
Lammalord(#4495)'s 1 Pacifiing Monkay 1 are destroyed during battle.
Unidentified Fleet(#0)'s 8787 CL Gamber Bay are destroyed during battle.
You attacked Unidentified Fleet(#0)'s fleet and mothership from deep space.
You destroyed Unidentified Fleet(#0)'s 8787 ships and lost 2/5 ships.
Your attack failed and achieved nothing.
You inflicted insufficient damage on Unidentified Fleet(#0).
(+4235 Exp)
that was a 2% mission dam! that fleet costed 61quad (2x the cost of my fleet) and had a power of about 1 quad (same as my fleet) so in the end this small 2% mission had the power of about a 20% mission!! ouch!! ouch!! ouch!!
|
|
|
|
Midnight44
Staff Sergeant
Reputation: +6/-505
Offline
Posts: 332
Midnight44
|
|
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2006, 08:19:24 PM » |
|
Well, the ship cost: CL Gamber Bay 40920000000 551000000 40000000000 98 % 71 % 165.359.959.700 165359959700x368969=61.012.698.970.549.300 That is 60 quad. 1.5x your fleet. That shouldnt be too hard with good commander bonuses.  |
|
|
|
Lammalord
First Sergeant
Reputation: +64/-182
Offline
Posts: 1958
Lamma.
|
|
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2006, 09:55:30 PM » |
|
well sure, but when you include the swarm bonos on them ships your screwed up the ass..
|
|
|
|
TheMerchant
Sergeant
Reputation: +2/-7
Offline
Posts: 237
|
|
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2006, 11:45:24 PM » |
|
no kidding id like that design
|
WARS Account= Overmind
|
|
|
Lammalord
First Sergeant
Reputation: +64/-182
Offline
Posts: 1958
Lamma.
|
|
« Reply #4 on: September 26, 2006, 12:04:06 AM » |
|
im just mad i cant show off 3 uprages in a day now.. darn :p
|
|
|
|
Gunfighter Frank
Master Sergeant
Reputation: +36/-6
Offline
Posts: 806
|
|
« Reply #5 on: September 26, 2006, 12:06:57 AM » |
|
so you like my designs I think it is funny many of the ships in that battle on both sides are TH designs
|
Gunfighter Frank
Semper-FI
DO or DIE
|
|
|
Soppe
Sergeant
Reputation: +2/-0
Offline
Posts: 256
Cheesy poops YEAH
|
|
« Reply #6 on: September 26, 2006, 06:10:27 AM » |
|
haha that same poop happened to me yesterday too. lost my biggest ship on a 5%  and frank ,its cuz some big guys cant make ships themselves... its under their dignity/skills i guess |
We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give. History will be kind to me for I intend to write it. -Winston Churchill  |
|
|
Lammalord
First Sergeant
Reputation: +64/-182
Offline
Posts: 1958
Lamma.
|
|
« Reply #7 on: September 26, 2006, 08:37:15 AM » |
|
emi, this is the second time in less than 12 hours that i went up against fleets 2-3 times stronger than my lead ship in a mission.. did you chance ANYTHING in missions or messed up anything over the last 12 hours to make missions do this? i used to never get this problem.. and now im about to give up even trying and find me a new game.. this sucks...
that fleet costed 41 quad, and had 581 trillion power.. my fleet costed 15 quad and had 200 trillion power.. these 2% missions sure dont feal like 2%.. something happened emi when you added that new update
Defender Unidentified Fleet (#)
Engaged Units
Fleet Name # of Units Attack Defence Hitpoints
Ironfist 229760260 357158327 570714 717271883
Assault Note
Lammalord(#4495)'s Nameless 1 fleet engaged Unidentified Fleet(#)'s Ironfist fleet on the battlefield.
The fleet Nameless 1 did 5259404053586613 damage to fleet Ironfist.
Lammalord(#4495)'s Nameless 1 fleet destroyed 7332511 of Unidentified Fleet(#)'s Ironfist fleet.
The fleet Ironfist did 8810998898997208 damage to fleet Nameless 1.
Unidentified Fleet(#)'s Ironfist fleet destroyed 1 of Lammalord(#4495)'s Nameless 1 fleet.
Lammalord(#4495)'s Flying rabbit go BOOM! 1 fleet engaged Unidentified Fleet(#)'s Ironfist fleet on the battlefield.
The fleet Flying rabbit go BOOM! 1 did 3821928767400915 damage to fleet Ironfist.
Lammalord(#4495)'s Flying rabbit go BOOM! 1 fleet destroyed 5328424 of Unidentified Fleet(#)'s Ironfist fleet.
The fleet Ironfist did 1450834768485071 damage to fleet Flying rabbit go BOOM! 1.
Unidentified Fleet(#)'s Ironfist attack failed.
Lammalord(#4495)'s hole in the side! 1 fleet engaged Unidentified Fleet(#)'s Ironfist fleet on the battlefield.
The fleet hole in the side! 1 did 2743822302761640 damage to fleet Ironfist.
Lammalord(#4495)'s hole in the side! 1 fleet destroyed 3825358 of Unidentified Fleet(#)'s Ironfist fleet.
The fleet Ironfist did 2343656164475883 damage to fleet hole in the side! 1.
Unidentified Fleet(#)'s Ironfist attack failed.
Lammalord(#4495)'s Pacifiing Monkay 1 fleet engaged Unidentified Fleet(#)'s Ironfist fleet on the battlefield.
The fleet Pacifiing Monkay 1 did 1359870181075897 damage to fleet Ironfist.
Lammalord(#4495)'s Pacifiing Monkay 1 fleet destroyed 1895893 of Unidentified Fleet(#)'s Ironfist fleet.
The fleet Ironfist did 558013372494259 damage to fleet Pacifiing Monkay 1.
Unidentified Fleet(#)'s Ironfist attack failed.
Assault result
Lammalord(#4495)'s 1 Nameless 1 are destroyed during battle.
Unidentified Fleet(#0)'s 18382186 Ironfist are destroyed during battle.
You attacked Unidentified Fleet(#0)'s fleet and mothership from deep space.
You destroyed Unidentified Fleet(#0)'s 18382186 ships and lost 1/4 ships.
Your attack failed and achieved nothing.
You inflicted insufficient damage on Unidentified Fleet(#0).
(+4235 Exp)
|
|
|
|
Soppe
Sergeant
Reputation: +2/-0
Offline
Posts: 256
Cheesy poops YEAH
|
|
« Reply #8 on: September 26, 2006, 08:45:12 AM » |
|
yeah, i was doing 5% missions for a week, without any probs. after the update, i use 1000 turns b4 i get runned over. surely been messed up :S
|
We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give. History will be kind to me for I intend to write it. -Winston Churchill |
|
|
Lammalord
First Sergeant
Reputation: +64/-182
Offline
Posts: 1958
Lamma.
|
|
« Reply #9 on: September 26, 2006, 08:56:35 AM » |
|
was it a 1 fleet mission? like i said something happened? and it hit me the worst
|
|
|
|
Soppe
Sergeant
Reputation: +2/-0
Offline
Posts: 256
Cheesy poops YEAH
|
|
« Reply #10 on: September 26, 2006, 09:00:23 AM » |
|
yes, 1 fleet, and it was just luck that i didnt lose as many ships as u i guess.
|
We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give. History will be kind to me for I intend to write it. -Winston Churchill |
|
|
Lammalord
First Sergeant
Reputation: +64/-182
Offline
Posts: 1958
Lamma.
|
|
« Reply #11 on: September 26, 2006, 09:02:27 AM » |
|
i already msged emi, hes telling me nothing changed.. well somethings bs when right after the update a 1 fleet misison's take 3 of my ships and already 1 of yours.. something happened, and if its a misake that emi did i would like to be reset to my previous power (if its a mistake) beacuse it would not be cool if i lost 600 trillion power due to emi's mistake with the scritps..
|
|
|
|
Soppe
Sergeant
Reputation: +2/-0
Offline
Posts: 256
Cheesy poops YEAH
|
|
« Reply #12 on: September 26, 2006, 09:05:18 AM » |
|
sure as hell doesnt look like a coincidence. bugs may occure during updates, though u may not want em there. maybe thats what occured, some number generator went bananas without emi seeing it...
|
We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give. History will be kind to me for I intend to write it. -Winston Churchill |
|
|
Lammalord
First Sergeant
Reputation: +64/-182
Offline
Posts: 1958
Lamma.
|
|
« Reply #13 on: September 26, 2006, 09:06:47 AM » |
|
ya, excally, but what im thinking is more simpler the shild on 1 fleet misisons to liment the cost and such was removed or something making 1 fleet missions become deadly again..
|
|
|
|
Spayed
First Sergeant
Reputation: +87/-136
Offline
Posts: 1977
hey hey hey :D
|
|
« Reply #14 on: September 26, 2006, 09:14:08 AM » |
|
d**n lammy that sum really bad luck, but serves u rite for joining DDAY =P
|
Kyle!! (#8446) - main
Spayed (#7) - main
Spayed (#75) - wars
Spayed (#94) - pve
|
|
|
|
