Show Posts
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 147
|
31
|
Feedback Terminal / "Bugs" and Problems / Sea-O Server problems
|
on: May 13, 2010, 07:51:52 AM
|
emi, I know you don't check the mails on sea-o that often... (but i have seen an increase in activity in the game lately, which is nice...)
but I have reason to believe you may have some kind of virus on the server... my computer got sent to blue screen (then had to do 3 resets before becoming usable again) while playing your game... I do have other tabs open, but all of them are to fairly major sites (and were not active at the time) I'm pretty sure don't have viruses (ie Google, Weather.com, hotmail....) my computer was attacked while refreshing windows on your site.
I thought at first this was just some computer error or something else happened, but when i mentioned it on the chat one of the players noted that his computer crashed twice last week while playing sea-o. It may be nothing.... but it never hurts checking it out... if it helps (on where to look) my comp froze/crashed the first time after sending a message and glancing at the rankings.... it froze for about 30 seconds on the mail box (after i sent) unfroze, I clicked on rankings and... blue screen.
|
|
|
36
|
Feedback Terminal / Suggestions / Re: Anti-Alt (Yet another suggestion)
|
on: April 10, 2010, 07:15:28 AM
|
its really not that hard to track and limit 1-2 accounts per IP... lots of games do it... and if you use more than one you get a warning that both accounts will be banned... also a game I played before gives the option to share multiple IPs (aka friends living in the same house or dorm internet or something) if and only if both accounts are upgraded... but even then you had to request it... I'm sure some not a very nice person will abuse it in the end (as they did in that other game) but abuse goes from EVERYONE to maybe 3-5% and when it's that low its easier to catch and punish manually.
|
|
|
37
|
Feedback Terminal / Suggestions / Re: Planetary tractor beams
|
on: April 10, 2010, 07:11:39 AM
|
maybe if you fail miserably.. just make it a terribly low chance 1-2% chance of it even happening... so you rarely get a facepalm :p
also make it so the tractor beam "sucks the ship into orbit and it explodes" or something, otherwise this leave a hole for abuse...
|
|
|
38
|
Feedback Terminal / Suggestions / Re: system attacks
|
on: April 10, 2010, 07:07:41 AM
|
its virtually impossible to get a negative rep like it used to be. takes out the surprise of a bounty attack well we remembered what happened when you could get negative rep... yah, i think LOI placed first that round and only got their workers reset...
|
|
|
39
|
General Talk / General Discussion / Sea-O - You guys Missing all the fun!
|
on: April 10, 2010, 07:03:39 AM
|
Uber RoXorz Winzer(#5675) made a successful attack and Miller Time!!!!(#12417) lost 30.794.041.028.395.120 fleet power. Ahhhh I just blewed up 1st place and there is no one online to see it (maybe cause its 4 am) so I share here, maybe a few spaceo guys should play - sea-o would be quite fun if it had the activity... its spaceo back when you had to work for first... www.sea-o.net
|
|
|
40
|
Space Odyssey Caffe / Whatever / Re: ban j bomb
|
on: April 10, 2010, 07:01:28 AM
|
eh can ya just ban him a lil bit?
lol I remember when I got banned on the forums for a "little bit" aka 168 different IP's + half the city i live in :p
|
|
|
42
|
Feedback Terminal / Suggestions / Re: wars
|
on: April 09, 2010, 02:02:05 PM
|
wow, so what if people maxed in wars... it took what, 2-3 years??? isn't that a good time for the round anyways?
|
|
|
44
|
Feedback Terminal / Suggestions / Re: Sue you!
|
on: April 08, 2010, 06:24:22 PM
|
once again you got to remember the abuse factor - aka a strong guy could attack a smaller guy (intend not to kill their planet) then get sued and the small guy could get transferred wealth if enough of the people who get to vote are in on it.. this is most likely when a single allaince or a pair of allied alliances dominate a round - as it seems to happen quite often.
Yay! on top of the topics today, I am. Make it so 1) the voters can't be in the alliance of the requester. 2) The requester gets between 25-50% of what was taken. 3) The voters are deemed worthy by others. Approved :p what about participation? I know at times not many people play a round, and if half of them are in the same allaince and the other half isn't very active suits could take a long time... or never get checked by the players who get them... and for all i know the big guy could just say "screw you, I won't pay" and kill everyone that votes to pay up (or just kill the guy he attacked again for getting a suit :p) hell, I wouldn't pay a suit haha.
|
|
|
|