Title: Weapon Formula Post by: whitelightercarl on September 28, 2008, 01:36:20 AM Perfect Weapon Formula:
Weight:8 (see below if you will use 1 weight weapon) ATTACK = (http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/8719/weaponformulajn4.jpg) Where: EN = Energy ACCVALUE = 1% 977,131 2% 978,631 3% 980,131 4% 981,631 5% 983,131 6% 984,631 7% 986,131 8% 987,631 9% 989,131 10% 990,631 11% 992,131 12% 993,631 13% 995,131 14% 996,631 15% 998,131 16% 999,631 17% 1,001,131 18% 1,002,631 19% 1,004,131 20% 1,005,631 21% 1,007,131 22% 1,008,631 23% 1,010,131 24% 1,011,631 25% 1,013,131 26% 1,014,631 27% 1,016,131 28% 1,017,631 29% 1,019,131 30% 1,020,632 31% 1,020,633 32% 1,020,635 33% 1,020,639 34% 1,020,647 35% 1,020,663 36% 1,020,695 37% 1,020,759 38% 1,020,887 39% 1,021,143 40% 1,021,655 41% 1,022,679 42% 1,024,727 43% 1,028,823 44% 1,037,015 45% 1,053,399 46% 1,086,167 47% 1,151,703 48% 1,282,775 49% 1,544,919 50% 2,069,207 51% 3,117,783 52% 5,214,935 53% 9,409,239 54% 17,797,847 55% 34,575,063 56% 68,129,495 57% 135,238,359 58% 269,456,087 59% 537,891,543 60% 1,074,762,455 61% 2,148,504,279 62% 4,295,987,927 63% 8,590,955,223 64% 17,180,889,815 65% 34,360,758,999 Note: ***This formula applies only if energy input is more than 3102 ***Applies only for 8 weight weapon, add 999003 instead of 1019323 if the weapon's weight is 1. Title: Re: Weapon Formula Post by: Cameron07 on September 28, 2008, 03:21:03 AM stickied **
Title: Re: Weapon Formula Post by: Chronos on September 28, 2008, 03:35:20 AM Am I correct in assuming that this does not factor in computer percentages?
Title: Re: Weapon Formula Post by: whitelightercarl on September 28, 2008, 08:51:26 AM Am I correct in assuming that this does not factor in computer percentages? Yep it only applies for the accuracy in the weapons component. EDIT: Cam, thanks for putting this to sticky L:) Title: Re: Weapon Formula Post by: stupidyankee on September 28, 2008, 07:34:13 PM Sweet Finally :D thanks carl.
Title: Re: Weapon Formula Post by: whitelightercarl on December 20, 2008, 10:50:27 AM Someone just edited my post to thank himself :))
Oh lemme tell you formally... Cam, thanks for putting this to sticky :14: Title: Re: Weapon Formula Post by: Jan`go Vhett on March 12, 2009, 09:57:49 PM Perfect Weapon Formula: Weight:8 (see below if you will use 1 weight weapon) ATTACK = (http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/8719/weaponformulajn4.jpg) Where: EN = Energy ACCVALUE = 1% 977,131 2% 978,631 3% 980,131 4% 981,631 5% 983,131 6% 984,631 7% 986,131 8% 987,631 9% 989,131 10% 990,631 11% 992,131 12% 993,631 13% 995,131 14% 996,631 15% 998,131 16% 999,631 17% 1,001,131 18% 1,002,631 19% 1,004,131 20% 1,005,631 21% 1,007,131 22% 1,008,631 23% 1,010,131 24% 1,011,631 25% 1,013,131 26% 1,014,631 27% 1,016,131 28% 1,017,631 29% 1,019,131 30% 1,020,632 31% 1,020,633 32% 1,020,635 33% 1,020,639 34% 1,020,647 35% 1,020,663 36% 1,020,695 37% 1,020,759 38% 1,020,887 39% 1,021,143 40% 1,021,655 41% 1,022,679 42% 1,024,727 43% 1,028,823 44% 1,037,015 45% 1,053,399 46% 1,086,167 47% 1,151,703 48% 1,282,775 49% 1,544,919 50% 2,069,207 51% 3,117,783 52% 5,214,935 53% 9,409,239 54% 17,797,847 55% 34,575,063 56% 68,129,495 57% 135,238,359 58% 269,456,087 59% 537,891,543 60% 1,074,762,455 61% 2,148,504,279 62% 4,295,987,927 63% 8,590,955,223 64% 17,180,889,815 65% 34,360,758,999 Note: ***This formula applies only if energy input is more than 3102 ***Applies only for 8 weight weapon, add 999003 instead of 1019323 if the weapon's weight is 1. Perfect Weapon Formula: Weight:8 (see below if you will use 1 weight weapon) (http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/1897/wepsf3.jpg) Where: EN = Energy ACCVALUE = ACCURACY Note: ***This formula applies only if energy input is more than 3102 ***Applies only for 8 weight weapon, add 999003 instead of 1019323 if the weapon's weight is 1. Something doesn't match here :21: Title: Re: Weapon Formula Post by: whitelightercarl on March 13, 2009, 06:30:08 AM yeah if you look at the first posted formula it has a 10 divisor in the accvalue so I simplified it by dividing the values by 10 and changing the accvalue for the 2nd one because I noticed that all of the first accvalue is divisible by 10.
|