Forum - Space Odyssey MMORPG - a massive free online space game

General Talk => SO WARS Discussion => Topic started by: jessiedog on January 31, 2010, 10:10:52 AM



Title: Soveriegnty question
Post by: jessiedog on January 31, 2010, 10:10:52 AM
Hey folks, been a while. i looked around on the forum but couldn't find it. Could someone please explain to me the sovereignty and security over a quadrant? if its what i think it is then i like it  :wow:


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: SirEmi on January 31, 2010, 10:21:56 PM

Yeah, the idea was to give some bonuses if you have control over more quadrant stars, but it's not implemented yet.

Will take suggestions on it tough :)


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: Grondavor on January 31, 2010, 10:50:19 PM
hmm, seems to me like an easy way for the high power players to further widen the power gap


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: clouthour on February 01, 2010, 06:36:17 PM
hmm, seems to me like an easy way for the high power players to further widen the power gap

well everything seems like that to u :P

if this is implmented i suggest not reducing the size of the galaxy


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: Grondavor on February 01, 2010, 07:53:15 PM
hmm, seems to me like an easy way for the high power players to further widen the power gap

well everything seems like that to u :P

haha that might be true.   :D

And yes, if this is implemented definately do not reduce the galaxy size, and possible put a limit as to how many systems/quadrants a single player can have sovereignty over


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: Jan`go Vhett on February 01, 2010, 08:19:16 PM
Grondavor you have to realize that virtually anything implemented, unless specifically used to make it harder for them, will be able to be used to make the power gap between the high powered guys and the little guys bigger.


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: Grondavor on February 01, 2010, 09:37:33 PM
not necessarily...  i think the planet updates are really good


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: Spayed on February 02, 2010, 07:33:10 AM
and they were specifically designed 2 make it harder for better players..


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: Grondavor on February 02, 2010, 06:48:45 PM
no, it was just so that the high players cant just go around snatching planets from the lower players just because they can


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: Jan`go Vhett on February 02, 2010, 07:15:31 PM
That is the point it was designed specifically to limit higher players.


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: Spayed on February 02, 2010, 11:29:25 PM
which is what every suggestion or opinion you have made has been designed to do.. cause your new and u suck you want older players who learnt the game to be hindered so that you can pretend 2 be good..

and dont give me the top 30 poop.. i know you were fed 2 get there and quite frankly i can make top 30 with my eyes closed clicking random buttons...


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: clouthour on February 03, 2010, 12:30:14 PM
which is what every suggestion or opinion you have made has been designed to do.. cause your new and u suck you want older players who learnt the game to be hindered so that you can pretend 2 be good..

and dont give me the top 30 nuts.. i know you were fed 2 get there and quite frankly i can make top 30 with my eyes closed clicking random buttons...

lol spayed u r gone straight to number one on my list again :D :)


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: Grondavor on February 03, 2010, 08:12:07 PM
no no no!  the suggestion does NOT limit the high er players at all!  Most of the time the planets they take they just abandon afterwards, so they dont actually gain anything from it.  In fact they lose marines.  So really, this update will actually help them, and will help the lower players too, as they can keep their planets.


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: TNTTony on February 03, 2010, 08:47:20 PM
The update will mean that lower players will be able to keep their planets and therefore the power gap will be shortened between the higher players and the lower players, since the lower players is more likely to keep their planets and to grow.

Without the update the higher players we were just keep on taking over small planets and widening the power gap


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: Sostesteg on February 04, 2010, 04:15:10 PM
I've liked idea of sovereignty over a system... once a long time ago I suggested something along the lines of making blockade in order to do so.

GRONDAVOR! SPAYED! GRRRR! If you want to argue make ur own thread for it "Spayed and Grondavor's Daily Feud". (Grondavor you're usually [as in pretty much always] wrong too)


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: Spayed on February 05, 2010, 12:27:52 AM
no its much more interesting if we argue over lots of threads


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: Grondavor on February 05, 2010, 12:34:24 AM
haha i agree


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: Cameron07 on February 05, 2010, 01:38:13 AM
and this soveriegnty thing would be cool but its gotta be controlled a bit... otherwise one big alliance could own poop... but this should have been put in a while ago.. and yeah gron not everything should be changed to make it harder on the top guys and easier on the little.. the top guys should be able to take someones planet if they want to without extra penalties being added on them.. thats the benefit of being up top..


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: Spayed on February 05, 2010, 05:22:30 AM
yea there are alot of things that should have been implimented and would be awesome but they werent


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: jessiedog on March 02, 2010, 11:33:01 PM
and this soveriegnty thing would be cool but its gotta be controlled a bit... otherwise one big alliance could own nuts... but this should have been put in a while ago.. and yeah gron not everything should be changed to make it harder on the top guys and easier on the little.. the top guys should be able to take someones planet if they want to without extra penalties being added on them.. thats the benefit of being up top..

yea goddam liberals healthcare. sorry to all you liberals out there but its the same exact thing cam just said no to.

im using the above to emphasize my point so here it is.

in the past everyone was speaking about how the little guys have it hard. this game is simple. the people that work harder and know their stuff, and sometimes get lucky, will be on top. for no reason at all should someone who started playing a year into the server have the ability to go right to the top and outplace the people that have been there for a while working hard.

sovereignty=good idea.
dont place restrictions, if one alliance wants to control the universe, then the other ones better do something about it.




Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: Spayed on March 03, 2010, 12:34:16 AM
you make an excellent point mate.. but all emi has done recently is make it easier for newer players and harder for the old ones.


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: Grondavor on March 03, 2010, 09:32:07 PM
But see there lies the problem...  How do you expect us to be able to do anything about it if they control everything....


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: Spayed on March 04, 2010, 04:29:03 AM
learn... the same way we did...


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: clouthour on March 04, 2010, 11:52:13 AM
But see there lies the problem...  How do you expect us to be able to do anything about it if they control everything....

it the wars server. the clue is in the name


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: lehua768 on April 17, 2010, 09:49:18 PM
to me like an easy way for the high power players to further widen the power gap。


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: clouthour on April 19, 2010, 12:54:06 PM
to me like an easy way for the high power players to further widen the power gap。

thats a bad thing because???....


Title: Re: Soveriegnty question
Post by: KenquinnTheInsaneOne on April 19, 2010, 01:47:37 PM
Good god guys lehua768 is most likely a bot take a loot at the sig. However due to the post at least looking like a person made them i gave the account 48 hours to remove it. It has been 24 hours if it does not I will delete the replies to him so it does not look like you are talking to yourselves unless you object :12: