ok, I'm actually posting in this thread, so you all must already know something is seriously up, just from seeing I posted something in this thread... LOL.
anyway, this is a message someone has given my alliance: (out of goodwill alone, I shall take out their name)
-----------------------------------------
XXXXXXX(#XXXX)
2006-07-29 17:29:24
Hostile Actions
Hello, I have received messages from enzosis that nightguard has been attacking him. Tell nightguard to stop or things will start to become extremely violent. I promise never to attack anyone in G-Unit as long as they don't attack us. I am sorry that I have taken all of my rage out on you. You seem to be a very nice guy, but you must make sure that peace between us is maintained. Tell your alliance members that I will attack them all and not stop until they are completely wiped out, if any type of attack occurs again.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
ok... there are some SERIOUS prblems with this message, and I don't just mean that because maintaned was spelt wrong.
Hello, I have received messages from enzosis
1: this is about attacks against enzosis, so why he is not delivering this message? at the very least he could try to speak for himself, but as far as I know, this is the only message sent.
that nightguard has been attacking him
2: my alliance and this alliance are truced, last I checked. attacked HOW? if you mean bounty, how can you expect my alliance members to know who all is in your alliance if I DON'T EVEN KNOW THAT PERSON.
Tell nightguard to stop or things will start to become extremely violent
3: this is saying to tell nightguard to stop attacking... WHY CAN YOU NOT TELL MIGHTGUARD YOURSELF? maybe it is because you were explaining your counter against nightguard... except instead of nightguard, you hit duke instead? maybe you already ran out of counters?
I promise never to attack anyone in G-Unit as long as they don't attack us
4: don't make promises no one can keep. it is almost impossible to completely stop all attacks whatsoever, ESPECIALLY with the bounty system the way it is. and especially when you already most likely generated more counters yourself then what nightguard did. again, I don't know.
I am sorry that I have taken all of my rage out on you.
5: again, why bring duke into this when it was nightguard?
You seem to be a very nice guy, but you must make sure that peace between us is maintained
6: again, WHY are you sending this to duke, if nightgaurd is the one who did it?
Tell your alliance members that I will attack them all and not stop until they are completely wiped out, if any type of attack occurs again.
7: for your information, we have done quite well being attacked non-stop by up to 3-4 major alliances at the same time... this almost makes me want to tell my alliance members TO attack you, just to get your head back where it belongs. barring cheating and DDay, there is NO way whatsoever to bring an entire alliance down like youd escribed, so you are going to be warring against us for a pretty long time.
that would be it... except:
8: ok, maybe it is because you are his alliance leader, I could understand why you sent it instead. but why would you not send it to me, either? that's like telling a grunt (no offense, duke) in ana rmy to stop, while trying to leave the commanding officer totally unaware of the situation. it ISN'T going to happen like that.
9: upon hearing of this Nightguard HIMSELF has messaged you back, tryign to explain that HE DID NOT KNOW, and that he will stop attacking your alliance members, as long as he knows they are in your alliance. so far, NO REPLY WHATSOEVER.
if you know what I'm talking about, then I hope this makes it CRYSTAL clear. a message, and actions like this, will help START wars, NOT prevent them. almost the only actual worthwhile thing in this entire message that helped whatsoever to duke... was the part about telling his alliance. and that was it. so WHY did you not simply message either me, or nightguard, and save all this confusion? in fact, WHY have you not talked to or responded to the person WHO ACTUALLY DID THE OFFENSE and going so far as to REFUSING to do so? last I checked, the people in question are a secondary alliance, I hope the leader of the main alliance sees this as well, and sees my frustration as well, and considers it carefully, as I would not want someone who did something like this as a leader of one of my alliance's unless there were other reasons involved. ESPECIALLY a training alliance.
IN SHORT:
IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY, SAY IT TO EITHER:
1: THE PERSON HIMSELF
--OR--
2: SOMEONE IN CHARGE OVER THEM
NOT SOMEONE ELSE WHO IS NOW ATTACKED FOR SOMETHING HE DIDN'T DO, AND HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF.
hmm... planet G_Unit... I like that
where all the parties are. once a year. lol
