Forum - Space Odyssey MMORPG - a massive free online space game

Feedback Terminal => Suggestions => Topic started by: Lammalord on March 01, 2010, 04:22:39 AM



Title: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Lammalord on March 01, 2010, 04:22:39 AM
Quote from mgc
Quote
if u want a fair game for evry1, ull have to be very careful with ingame bonuses..
its hard enough (i think, not sure) to reach top 10 without gold account.. let alone if they all have xtra turns / credits whatever from last round

although real cash prizes usually work well to attract new players, it wont help to keep them unless they actually have a chance to win them..

-lower cash reward (a lot)
-tweak xchange rate for $
-larger reward base:
i.e. top 50 instead of top 10:

50-41 = $0.5
40-31 = $1
30-21 = $1.5
20-11 = $2
10-6  = $4
      5 = $6
      4 = $7
      3 = $8
      2 = $10
      1 = $15
------------
total: $116

Re-post for obvious reasons. Well mostly because I've been opposed to the Donations from the moment it was created (go, look at the update where he added it in, you're find my rants :p)

I want a game where people play for rank, not money.  And the obvious abuse with high winnings is killing the game slowly.  I mean come on, the same guys keep getting top ten cause they win, donate 50$, build a planet or mining facility, and BAM! 2-3 weeks ahead of the rest of the game, why?  cause they donated 50$ they won the last round.   


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Spayed on March 01, 2010, 04:50:43 AM
well its not really the same people everyround. there have been a few new ones every round.. and being opposed to donation is just stupid.. thats what keeps the game alive..

and its easier to learn the game then ever before.. so many guides and poop. even a training alliance..

sure lower rewards but u will lose more players then u keep..


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Lammalord on March 01, 2010, 05:04:37 AM
Everyone please note that the above came from this:

February 20, 2010, 12:06PM
1         Kyle!!(#8446)     SPayed super duper shippy     9.223.372.036.854.775.808
November 16, 2009, 22:48PM
3         Dopey Person who sells themself for money(#8446)     SPayed super duper shippy     9.223.372.036.854.775.808
August 18, 2009, 02:24AM
4         Kylie the street Person who sells themself for money(#8446)     SPayed super duper shippy     9.223.372.036.854.775.808     
May 25, 2009, 06:00AM
1         Spayed(#8446)     SPayed super duper shippy     9.223.372.036.854.775.808
December 04, 2008, 18:06PM
5         Spayed(#8446)     SPayed super duper shippy     9.223.372.036.854.775.808

+
_________________________
= 320$ earned from this game over the last year.  His words may be slightly swayed by obvious factors.  He's the kind of player we don't need anymore, one who plays for the money and not the rank.


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Spayed on March 01, 2010, 05:20:58 AM
you missed out the time i got killed with 10 seconds to go when i was in first :D

and lamma why are u even here, you dont play anymore.. how would you know what the game needs. im the sort of player others aim to beat.. i make people earn every rank they get..


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: V on March 01, 2010, 03:09:07 PM
im the sort of player others aim to beat.. i make people earn every rank they get..

I really should stay out of this... I really should... So I will keep it simple.
Kyle, win without donating beyond Gold, and win without breaking the unavailable TOS, and I shall then respect your play.


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Comatose on March 01, 2010, 03:36:17 PM
I respect kyle only because I know he could do it without donations. He does it to speed things up for a shorter round (:P)

I do think with this gay top 20 thing..lower top 10 rewards and give top 20 rewards..might as well..your telling noobs top ten doesn't matter if they get close..


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: davey boy on March 01, 2010, 03:46:08 PM
yeah its fine the way it is


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Lammalord on March 01, 2010, 05:34:24 PM
I respect kyle only because I know he could do it without donations. He does it to speed things up for a shorter round (:P)

No, he couldn't.  look at his number - It took him till a round where he was able to donate to ever place. Quite frankly i don't think he could place top ten without donations, he just doesn't have the skill.

there was a good 7 or 8 rounds before the donation started that he played...  then 2-3 rounds later (when the rewards doubled) (and  that resource reward for 50$ appeared)suddenly he got "amazing" at the game.  he would never place top without donating.

I do think with this gay top 20 thing..lower top 10 rewards and give top 20 rewards..might as well..your telling noobs top ten doesn't matter if they get close..

Lower the reward to attract real players (not those who look at money and play)  and broaden the reward base so new players don't quit thinking its futile to keep playing cause they'd never beat the top ten.


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: davey boy on March 01, 2010, 06:27:22 PM
god dont you ever stop moaning nothings ever right with you he had to place to get the reward the first time so obviously hes good enough :yawn:


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Pirate55 on March 01, 2010, 07:34:24 PM
nah i think its good the way it is.

and if we did this it would make top ten even less special.


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Cameron07 on March 01, 2010, 08:42:43 PM
agreed with pirate... maybe 100 is a bit beefed up but hell im in the top 5ish right now and doing pretty good and i only used 5$ of donations on main.. i used most of my prize money for cp on wars... its all about how you play.. there just isn't that many good players anymore.. we usually have about 8 good players each round and they show it, kyle is a good player.. those floating around 10-20 on dday are just decent.. most are newer or just havent learned the game that well.. you can't punish the top few because there isn't much competition anymore.. and i've never seen kyle to cheat.. he keeps within the tos, or at least everytime i have played with him he has.. theres other people you need to be telling the tos too


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: wolfy28 on March 01, 2010, 08:55:35 PM
OMG what drama. all this time SO is just like an after school specal. enough talk and get with the killing. forums is for ones who have no skills. i respect no one til they beat me in battle and argus is the only one that could ever do that. bottom line if u want respect. then ram someones own ships down there throats.


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Jan`go Vhett on March 01, 2010, 09:17:38 PM
OMG what drama. all this time SO is just like an after school specal. enough talk and get with the killing. forums is for ones who have no skills. i respect no one til they beat me in battle and argus is the only one that could ever do that. bottom line if u want respect. then ram someones own ships down there throats.

Agreed :D


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Spayed on March 02, 2010, 12:09:58 AM
heh i have already proved myself lamma :D and think back. even in those rounds before i started making top 10 i was always up there and i quit half way thru the game.. and it did take a while for me to learn.. the people that play the game with me now they know how i play.. hell i taught them a few things.. wes considering the strategy you are using this round is exactly what i told you to do. and i taught you plenty you are going to go here and say you dont respect me? guess the help stops there ay..

and wolfy does make a good point :D, ill go back to destroying everyone.. just like i have been doing the past many rounds... i wish you all luck :D u will need it


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: wolfy28 on March 02, 2010, 02:05:07 AM
that reminds me. last 2 rounds i played. spayed kept attacking me. then after i 0red him. he would ask me how i did that. so i would give him pointers. cuz easy kills r no fun at all. then last round i played. it would seem that he listened. i couldn't 0 him no more. it's all about learning. u can have all the cash in the world to donate to SO. but without skills. u will still get killed. same arguement lamma used 5 years ago. i never forget. it's a curse most times tho. but the few times like now it's very useful. so that 100 dollars for winning first ain't nothing without skills to back it.


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Lammalord on March 02, 2010, 02:26:15 AM
oh, I always have a way with bringing the best out of people :p

Maybe it wasn't my skill that was remembered as much as it was my ability to enrage people to fight :p

but this post isn't about skill - It's about removing the donation so we can go back to the times when people played for rank and loyalty, not the money.  Quite frankly the same thing happens every round.. someone gets strong - no one wants to fight that someone, everyone joins the same alliance and they sim till victory.  Of course a round lasts only two months now, cause there is not even fighting between the top ten to greatly slow the rate of growth.


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Spayed on March 02, 2010, 04:05:53 AM
and we broke that alliance up this round to try and have more fun and competition. out alliance was the best because we worked as a team. but without anyone to go against us it was getting boring. we have split up this round and hopefully it will be more interesting


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Nephadral on March 02, 2010, 09:32:00 AM
heh i have already proved myself lamma :D and think back. even in those rounds before i started making top 10 i was always up there and i quit half way thru the game.. and it did take a while for me to learn.. the people that play the game with me now they know how i play.. hell i taught them a few things.. wes considering the strategy you are using this round is exactly what i told you to do. and i taught you plenty you are going to go here and say you dont respect me? guess the help stops there ay..

and wolfy does make a good point :D, ill go back to destroying everyone.. just like i have been doing the past many rounds... i wish you all luck :D u will need it

LOL, i remember you quitting halfway though the rounds (I was in your alliance), you never wanted to marine.  I quit main for awhile and when I came back it had all changed.  I think you have done a great job in perfecting a strategy for main now, cheers for sticking it out finally.

Anyway, onto the topic.  I would be in favor of lowering the rewards.  Not because I don't think people deserve rewards for their excellence, but because it would help make everyone have to compete that much more from one round to another.

As has been suggested in other threads, I like the idea of some sort of in-game recognition for having placed TOP 10.  I think top ten should be more about bragging rights than money.


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: davey boy on March 02, 2010, 09:50:19 AM
yeah i can see that lower rewards could help actually people who cant get gold could really benefit from this and would attract new players cut the top rewards in half and split between the top 20


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Spayed on March 02, 2010, 08:15:42 PM
how about just make it so that we cant get affiliate for the first week or so? that would stop the winners gaining a massive advantage at the start


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Nephadral on March 03, 2010, 08:03:20 AM
that is a viable option too


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Lammalord on March 03, 2010, 03:19:27 PM
how about just make it so that we cant get affiliate for the first week or so? that would stop the winners gaining a massive advantage at the start

then you'd just wait for the 2nd week :p

you gotta give it enough time for people to naturally be able to get space stations... How long does it take to get a space station/planets without donating?  2-3 weeks?  I know back in the day it took 4-5 days+ (up to a week) for the first person to get a 1 bil ship for encounters. and it took even longer to get the CP to be able to build the stations/planets.


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: KenquinnTheInsaneOne on March 03, 2010, 03:29:42 PM
how about just make it so that we cant get affiliate for the first week or so? that would stop the winners gaining a massive advantage at the start

then you'd just wait for the 2nd week :p

you gotta give it enough time for people to naturally be able to get space stations... How long does it take to get a space station/planets without donating?  2-3 weeks?  I know back in the day it took 4-5 days+ (up to a week) for the first person to get a 1 bil ship for encounters. and it took even longer to get the CP to be able to build the stations/planets.
I can get a station up in under a week I think I did it in 3 or 4 days one round. After that getting up the rest is easy you just need CPs and turns


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Jan`go Vhett on March 03, 2010, 03:40:05 PM
With a little luck you can have one up the 3rd day without donating.


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Spayed on March 04, 2010, 04:28:24 AM
3rd day without donating easy.. only thing that may stop me would be cp..


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: FTP on March 04, 2010, 07:55:43 AM
No affilate in the first week sounds good, without donating you could have 2-3 stations at that time


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Nephadral on March 04, 2010, 08:47:50 AM
one week is good, two weeks is better, any more than that and its overkill, i vote for 2 weeks


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: davey boy on March 04, 2010, 12:43:57 PM
well if thats the case then its not fair that people can donate either for first week myself included if your going to say that


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: V on March 04, 2010, 07:46:02 PM
^^^ agreed.  If we couldnt use affiliate I would just use my money to donate.
However I doubt Emi would take that ability away as he makes quite a bit of money in the first week from donations. And I know that if I got several stations without donating... it would be that much less I would donate. (if that makes sense)


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: TNTTony on March 04, 2010, 09:17:17 PM
He won't do anything. He has made it clear to me that donations are important for the maintenance of the servers.

I suggested two rounds ago to a personal e-mail to him that a compromise could be to  limit  the amount of donations/affiliates that can be used per day. For example, maybe you can only use $10 of donations or affiliates every second or third day. In this way people can still donate and he can still get his "server maintenance" but no one can just put down a massive $10,000 :-)


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Spayed on March 04, 2010, 11:45:32 PM
meh let jeffy put down 10 grand :D, server could use some maintinence :D


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: J-Bomb on March 28, 2010, 10:23:31 PM
meh let jeffy put down 10 grand :D, server could use some maintinence :D

HAHAHA ROFL that was a funny round


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: J-Bomb on March 28, 2010, 10:26:13 PM
i see, there now a top 20 in hall of fame, nice



i think it only fair to other they get like 1$ or somethink like that.  :21:


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Spayed on March 29, 2010, 01:16:41 AM
it should have been kept at top 10 or reduced to top 5..
its too easy to get top 10..


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: J-Bomb on March 29, 2010, 04:06:52 AM
Spayed when u had top tens a few times yo can say that,  but i does come down to how meny people are playing,  i do think what the point seeing you in hall of fame top 20 if you got nout for it.

maybe not $ maybe a free gold account?? 3months?


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Comatose on March 29, 2010, 02:59:57 PM
With the amount of people playing..it should be top 5..


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Spayed on March 30, 2010, 01:18:51 AM
thats the point not many people are playing so why should we give players that really dont deserve it the honor of being in the halls


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: V on March 30, 2010, 04:53:40 PM
agreed. but Emi liked highlands idea better; thinking it would attract more players with how easy it is to get in the halls of glory... : (


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Jan`go Vhett on March 30, 2010, 04:56:09 PM
You know I don't care either way.
It is rather obvious who the good players are regardless of Halls of Glory.


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Spayed on March 31, 2010, 01:29:16 AM
yea its emy!


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: davey boy on February 12, 2011, 09:21:24 AM
sorry to bring this topic up again but i thought a bout it and i think there should only be one prize and thats for first place then that would encourage top ten to battle each other as well


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Saturn 7 on February 12, 2011, 12:43:36 PM
Interesting idea, it would create an all or nothing situation for the top 10, but...

I'd say many of the people that get a top 10 position use the rewards to get or renew a gold account (me for example) without that, many would not have gold, therefore would not have a chance in a rabbits brothel of getting anywhere. Some could quit as a result of that.

To get the no.1 spot generally involves donating (and I include using affiliate winnings too). This usually means the ones with the cash generally win, and by having just 1 prize, that person would have a massive advantage each round thereafter.

Unfortunately every solution has it's resulting dissadvantage....

Take the situation that borg is currently in.... He has a massive lead and can wipe anyone he want through attacking stuctures (as I've recently found out :crutch: ). A solution would be to link total mothership power into whether he can attack lower lvl players planets or not, but then that would decrease PVP and push people like Borg away from the game again.  No easy solution!

I haven't a problem with what Borg did to me, that's just what happens within the current SpaceO set up, as always I'll take it on the chin and carry on.


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: davey boy on February 12, 2011, 02:55:22 PM
good point bro make no rewards at all they were good old days when wars were for placings not cash now that was fun


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Borg! on February 12, 2011, 08:21:49 PM
Saturn I did warn you a week ago that I'd be attacking you  :(


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Saturn 7 on February 12, 2011, 08:42:42 PM
I know, I'm not complaining about it..... why do you think I went ocean this round and not my normal route of Gaia? I at least wanted to make it harder for you to take!! :P


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Borg! on February 12, 2011, 10:51:54 PM
aye I was annoyed at the 2nd hit, because I rebelled it in 1 attack  :2:


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Saturn 7 on February 13, 2011, 08:32:36 AM
One thing that was annoying.... I had all those counters against you but they were all pretty useless.  I couldn't get anywhere near your ships, the co-ops gave me virtually nothing, I think about 6 mill credits... which at this stage I can almost get by voting! 


Title: Re: Lower Cash Rewards, Reward top 50
Post by: Borg! on February 14, 2011, 03:48:06 AM
I know how to adjust fire for counters coming in. what can I say :) hk hated me for it.