The Ethics of Bot Lobbies in Battlefield 6: Harmless Practice or Unfair Advantag

The topic of bot lobbies in Battlefield 6 really divides players. On one hand, practicing against bots is great for newcomers who don?t want to be cannon fodder. On the other, some versions of these lobbies artificially boost stats or rank ? and that?s where things get controversial.

I?ve noticed names like U4GM pop up in these discussions ? they?re widely known for gaming marketplaces and in-game item trades. Some players assume that any mention of bot lobbies means cheating, but that?s not always the case. Sometimes, it?s just about creating a private, AI-filled match to practice.

Still, it raises ethical questions: if a player uses a bot lobby to unlock attachments faster, is that fair? Does it hurt the integrity of multiplayer stats?

For me, the best solution would be official training systems directly from DICE ? something robust, customizable, and safe. That way, players wouldn?t need to risk shady third-party options.

I think it?s fine to discuss these things openly, as long as we?re clear on the difference between practicing legitimately and breaking the rules. What?s everyone?s take? Should Battlefield 6 embrace training lobbies officially to reduce temptation for exploits?